{"id":1155,"date":"2014-01-23T16:00:53","date_gmt":"2014-01-23T15:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/?p=1155"},"modified":"2015-12-09T18:37:12","modified_gmt":"2015-12-09T17:37:12","slug":"hanging-sessions-dp-7-01","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2014\/01\/hanging-sessions-dp-7-01\/","title":{"rendered":"Hanging Sessions with DP 7.01"},"content":{"rendered":"

Es wurde bereits mehrmals beobachtet und von anderen erz\u00e4hlt dass es mit DP 7.01 zu h\u00e4ngenden Sessions kommen kann oder die Sicherung nach 7200 Sekunden Timeout abbricht. Diese IPC Meldung (Beispiel – siehe unten), bei der keine Daten mehr vom Agenten an den Media Agenten oder Cell Server gesendet werden, ist generell ein Netzwerkthema. In der Regel sind Firewalls daf\u00fcr verantwortlich die eine Verbindung einfach kappen wenn kein Traffic mehr gesendet wird, obwohl dies aus Sicherungssicht normal sein kann. Als L\u00f6sung zeigt sich hier die omnirc Datei, diese Werte sollte mindestens enthalten sein; ich empfehle auch mal den DPcfgCreator<\/a> von Stephan Voss zu testen.<\/p>\n

Update: <\/b>Die Variablen OB2IPCKEEPALIVETIME<\/code> und OB2IPCKEEPALIVEINTERVAL<\/code> sind nur f\u00fcr Windows g\u00fcltig, auf Linux und HP-UX wird das TCP Verhalten auf Betriebssystem-Ebene (Kernel Parameter) gesteuert und f\u00fcr Data Protector ist die Variable OB2IPCKEEPALIVE<\/code> notwendig. F\u00fcr weiterf\u00fchrende Informationen wird auf den Artikel http:\/\/h30499.www3.hp.com\/t5\/Data-Protector-Support-and-News\/Data-Protector-Support-Tip-Linux-Only-Using-KeepAlive-to-resolve\/td-p\/6263015#.UuC5thQwc08<\/a> verwiesen. Danke an Alexander.<\/p>\n

OB2SHMIPC=0<\/code>
\nOB2IPCKEEPALIVE=1<\/code>
\nOB2INETTIMEOUT=10<\/code>
\nOB2IPCKEEPALIVETIME=900<\/code>
\nOB2IPCKEEPALIVEINTERVAL=60<\/code><\/p>\n

\r\n[Major] From: BSM@< client > \"Exchange\"  Time: 11.09.2012 01:00:55\r\n[61:3003]             Lost connection to OB2BAR Backup DA named \"ERROR\"\r\n                on host < client >.\r\n                Ipc subsystem reports: \"IPC Read Error\r\n                System error: [10054] Verbindung wurde von Peer zur\u00fcckgesetzt\"\r\n\r\n\r\n[Major] From: BSM@< client > \"Exchange\"  Time: 11.09.2012 01:00:55\r\n[61:3003]             Lost connection to OB2BAR Backup DA named \"ERROR\"\r\n                on host < client >.\r\n                Ipc subsystem reports: \"IPC Read Error\r\n                System error: [10054] Connection reset by peer\"\r\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Es wurde bereits mehrmals beobachtet und von anderen erz\u00e4hlt dass es mit DP 7.01 zu h\u00e4ngenden Sessions kommen kann oder die Sicherung nach 7200 Sekunden Timeout abbricht. Diese IPC Meldung (Beispiel – siehe unten), bei der keine Daten mehr vom Agenten an den Media Agenten oder Cell Server gesendet werden, ist generell ein Netzwerkthema. In […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"spay_email":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[153,155,154],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.8.8","language":"de","enabled_languages":["en","de"],"languages":{"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"de":{"title":false,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p28cjj-iD","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1517,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/07\/virtual-environment-backups-vmware-storeonce-aborting-randomly\/","url_meta":{"origin":1155,"position":0},"title":"Virtual Environment Backups (VMware) to StoreOnce aborting randomly","date":"19. Juli 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}When backing up virtual machines using the Virtual Environment Integration (VE) to a Catalyst Gateway (StoreOnce), with Data Protector 7.01 (current patches) the VEPA backups might aborting randomly. The error message displayed: [Major] From: BSM@server.demo.local \"VE_Backup_VMware\" Time: 15\/07\/2013 10:03:03 [61:3003] Lost connection to BMA named \"StoreOnce_01_GW1 [GW 2296:4:26641437476]\" on host\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "HowTo"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1365,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/05\/ipc-invalid-packet-size\/","url_meta":{"origin":1155,"position":1},"title":"IPC Invalid Packet Size","date":"8. Mai 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}After the upgrade to DP 7.01 in some environments the rarley error IPC Invalid Packet Size has been seen while accessing a changer or tape device. The problem might be related to a slow name resolutuion on the media agent. The INET may run into a timeout before sending data\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "HowTo"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1419,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/06\/nss-volumes-linux-oes\/","url_meta":{"origin":1155,"position":2},"title":"NSS Volumes on Linux OES","date":"4. Juni 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}When you need to backup NSS volumes on a Linux OES server with Data Protector 7.01 - current patches, it might be the case that the NSS volumes are not listed within GUI and you might receive the following error: 12:1304 The mountpoint\/file-system cannot be backed up. Probally you might\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bugs"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1169,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2012\/10\/dp-7-01-remote-installation-linux-working\/","url_meta":{"origin":1155,"position":3},"title":"DP 7.01 remote installation Linux not working","date":"1. Oktober 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With Data Protector 7.01 there might be a problem when doing a remote installation of a Linux Client with Kernel 3 (i.e. SLES 11 SP2). In the GUI you might receive an error that the client is not supportet. This is a known problem and was fixed in previous versions\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Common"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1320,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/03\/advisory-c03705726\/","url_meta":{"origin":1155,"position":4},"title":"Advisory c03705726","date":"26. M\u00e4rz 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c03705726 on 2013\/03\/20 an advisory for HP Data Protector and 7.0 (7.01) was released, describing a problem when a backup was taken to a backup to disk device and in restore context of DP GUI the file size is displayed as zero. As a workaround the list\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Advisory"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1393,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/05\/advisory-c03753986\/","url_meta":{"origin":1155,"position":5},"title":"Advisory c03753986","date":"25. Mai 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c03753986 on 2013\/05\/06 an advisory for HP Data Protector 6.11, 6.20, 6.21, 7.0 and 7.01 was released, describing a problem for restores of SAP data files and the file size is different from the SAP data file. When the omnirc parameter OB2SAPALIGN was used on Unix a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Advisory"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1155"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1155"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1155\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2601,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1155\/revisions\/2601"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1155"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1155"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1155"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}