{"id":1480,"date":"2013-07-05T13:20:35","date_gmt":"2013-07-05T12:20:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/?p=1480"},"modified":"2015-12-09T18:53:31","modified_gmt":"2015-12-09T17:53:31","slug":"data-protector-8-00-cifs-share-backup","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/07\/data-protector-8-00-cifs-share-backup\/","title":{"rendered":"Data Protector 8.00 and CIFS Share Backup"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Wenn man unter Data Protector 8.00 ein CIFS Share &#8211; Network Share Backup &#8211; sichern m\u00f6chte (egal ob eine Windows Freigabe oder einen (NetApp) Filer), kann es passieren das <b>nichts<\/b> gesichert wird, wenn die Auswahl auf oberster Ebene f\u00fcr den Share in der Backupspezifikation erfolgt und damit alle Ordner gesichert werden sollen. Der Job wird einfach als erfolgreich beendet. W\u00e4hlt man dagegen einzelne Dateien in Unterverzeichnissen aus, werden diese korrekt gesichert. Dieses Problem tritt auch auf, obwohl man sich exakt an die Anleitung zum Einrichten des Network Share Backups h\u00e4lt und selbst dann wenn in den lokalen Sicherheitrichtlinien der Benutzer unter &#8222;Ersetzen des Tokens auf Prozessebene&#8220; hinzugef\u00fcgt wurde. Grund hierf\u00fcr ist ein ge\u00e4ndertes Verhalten beim Browsen im Filesystem zu Beginn der Sicherung (Treewalk) f\u00fcr Data Protector 8.00. Mit der omnirc Variable <code>OB2_USE_OLDER_TREEWALK=1<\/code> auf dem Client \u00fcber den der Network Share gesichert werden soll, bewegt man Data Protector dazu das alte Browseverhalten einzusetzen. Mit dieser Einstellung funktioniert nun auch die Sicherung des CIFS Shares einer NetApp. Bleibt nur noch zu erw\u00e4hnen, dass f\u00fcr die Sicherung einer NetApp die NDMP Integration aus Sicherungssicht effizienter ist verglichen mit dem Network Share Backup.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Wenn man unter Data Protector 8.00 ein CIFS Share &#8211; Network Share Backup &#8211; sichern m\u00f6chte (egal ob eine Windows Freigabe oder einen (NetApp) Filer), kann es passieren das nichts gesichert wird, wenn die Auswahl auf oberster Ebene f\u00fcr den Share in der Backupspezifikation erfolgt und damit alle Ordner gesichert werden sollen. Der Job wird [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"spay_email":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.8.8","language":"de","enabled_languages":["en","de"],"languages":{"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"de":{"title":false,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p28cjj-nS","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1328,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/04\/vmware-backup-nbd-san\/","url_meta":{"origin":1480,"position":0},"title":"VMware backup done over NBD instead of SAN","date":"11. April 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}Problem: The backup of some virtual machines is done using transport mode NBD instead of SAN, even if it is configured for the virtual machine or a vApp container. There might be other virtual machines on the same SAN disk, which are able to do the backup over SAN. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;HowTo&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":500,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2011\/05\/cannot-connect-to-the-scm-omniinetpasswd\/","url_meta":{"origin":1480,"position":1},"title":"Cannot connect to the SCM &#8211; omniinetpasswd","date":"9. Mai 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}During a push installation of the Data Protector Client to a Windows 2008 box, you may receive following error. In the internet or in the documentation of Data Protector you'll find the needed steps to address this error message. To be complete... it is also posted here. Cannot connect to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;HowTo&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1432,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/06\/hp-data-protector-8-00-announced\/","url_meta":{"origin":1480,"position":2},"title":"HP Data Protector 8.00 announced","date":"13. Juni 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}During the event \"Discover\" HP announced the newest version of Data Protector - 8.00. The main approach is scalability for HP's latest version of backup and recovery software. More than thousand clients can be protected by Data Protector, up to 1000 sessions can run concurrently, up to 100000 sessions per\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Common&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1801,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2014\/01\/storeonce-success-story\/","url_meta":{"origin":1480,"position":3},"title":"Share your StoreOnce success story","date":"17. Januar 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}HP StoreOnce, the leading and proofed deduplication technology by HP, helps customers worldwide to solve the current and future requirements for Backup & Recovery. To shorten the backup window, data protection for remote and branch offices, cost reduction and reliability are some hot topics for customers. Now, it's your turn,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;SCD&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1588,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/09\/backup-performance\/","url_meta":{"origin":1480,"position":4},"title":"Backup performance","date":"23. September 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}If it matters, you had better trust on HP Data Protector to get fast backups and to achieve your backup windows. During the implementation of a StoreOnce appliance with a partner of HP, the following performance values were achieved (see pictures below). The environment: a backup of 5 virtual machines\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Common&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1320,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/03\/advisory-c03705726\/","url_meta":{"origin":1480,"position":5},"title":"Advisory c03705726","date":"26. M\u00e4rz 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c03705726 on 2013\/03\/20 an advisory for HP Data Protector and 7.0 (7.01) was released, describing a problem when a backup was taken to a backup to disk device and in restore context of DP GUI the file size is displayed as zero. As a workaround the list\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1480"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1480"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1480\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2633,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1480\/revisions\/2633"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1480"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1480"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}