{"id":1512,"date":"2013-07-16T06:40:26","date_gmt":"2013-07-16T05:40:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/?p=1512"},"modified":"2015-12-09T18:52:23","modified_gmt":"2015-12-09T17:52:23","slug":"advisory-c03823106","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/07\/advisory-c03823106\/","title":{"rendered":"Advisory c03823106"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Unter der Dokument ID c03823106 ist am 10.07.2013 bei HP zu Data Protector 6.21, 7.01 und 8.00 ein Advisory erschienen, welches ein Problem bei der Sicherung mit VSS beschreibt. In einigen F\u00e4llen kann es passieren, dass der VSS Snapshot korrupt ist und Data Protector den korrupten Snapshot gesichert hat.<\/p>\n<p>Da die Ursache des Problems bei Microsoft liegt, wird der Fix von MS geliefert &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/support.microsoft.com\/kb\/2748349\">http:\/\/support.microsoft.com\/kb\/2748349<\/a>. Windows 7 SP1 und Windows 2008 R2 SP1 haben den Fix bereits inkludiert.<\/p>\n<p>Der vollst\u00e4ndige Artikel kann hier nachgelesen werden: <b><a href=\"http:\/\/h20565.www2.hp.com\/portal\/site\/hpsc\/template.PAGE\/public\/kb\/docDisplay\/?spf_p.tpst=kbDocDisplay&#038;spf_p.prp_kbDocDisplay=wsrp-navigationalState%3DdocId%253Demr_na-c03823106-1%257CdocLocale%253D%257CcalledBy%253D&#038;javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&#038;javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken\">http:\/\/h20565.www2.hp.com\/portal\/site\/hpsc\/template.PAGE\/public\/kb\/docDisplay\/?spf_p.tpst=kbDocDisplay&#038;spf_p.prp_kbDocDisplay=wsrp-navigationalState%3DdocId%253Demr_na-c03823106-1%257CdocLocale%253D%257CcalledBy%253D&#038;javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&#038;javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Unter der Dokument ID c03823106 ist am 10.07.2013 bei HP zu Data Protector 6.21, 7.01 und 8.00 ein Advisory erschienen, welches ein Problem bei der Sicherung mit VSS beschreibt. In einigen F\u00e4llen kann es passieren, dass der VSS Snapshot korrupt ist und Data Protector den korrupten Snapshot gesichert hat. Da die Ursache des Problems bei [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"spay_email":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.8.8","language":"de","enabled_languages":["en","de"],"languages":{"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"de":{"title":false,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p28cjj-oo","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1964,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2014\/04\/advisory-ms-windows-2012-deduplication-hp-data-protector-data-loss\/","url_meta":{"origin":1512,"position":0},"title":"Advisory: MS Windows 2012 Deduplication and HP Data Protector &#8211; Possible Data Loss","date":"23. April 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}Since MS Windows 2012 is supported with Data Protector, the disk agent is able to backup and restore files from deduplicated volumes. However, when the deduplicated volume is mounted into NTFS folder, the disk agent cannot recognize the deduplicated volume and hence, cannot backup the Chunk Store. No error messages\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":828,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2011\/12\/advisory-c03117812\/","url_meta":{"origin":1512,"position":1},"title":"Advisory c03117812","date":"19. Dezember 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c02928162 on 2010\/07\/22 an advisory for HP Data Protector 6.1X and Data Protector 6.2 was released, describing a problem with high memory utilzationwhen using on Windows 2008 R2. There is a solution which can be requested from Microsoft, in the article you find the corresponding links. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1393,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/05\/advisory-c03753986\/","url_meta":{"origin":1512,"position":2},"title":"Advisory c03753986","date":"25. Mai 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c03753986 on 2013\/05\/06 an advisory for HP Data Protector 6.11, 6.20, 6.21, 7.0 and 7.01 was released, describing a problem for restores of SAP data files and the file size is different from the SAP data file. When the omnirc parameter OB2SAPALIGN was used on Unix a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":173,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2010\/09\/advisory-c02499272\/","url_meta":{"origin":1512,"position":3},"title":"Advisory c02499272","date":"17. September 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}No translation for this article available.{:} {:de} Unter der Dokument ID c02499272 ist am 08.09.2010 bei HP zu Data Protector 6.11 ein Advisory erschienen, welches ein Problem bei der Verwendung von Filesystembackups mit Volume Shadow Copy Services unter Windows 2003 und Windows 2008 beschreibt; unter bestimmten Umst\u00e4nden werden nicht alle\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2061,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2014\/07\/advisory-c04318203\/","url_meta":{"origin":1512,"position":4},"title":"Advisory c04318203","date":"23. Juli 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c04318203 on 2014\/06\/13 an advisory for HP Data Protector 8.1X was released, describing several resolutions for problems when using the Virtual Environment Integration to backup virtual machines. The article covers parameters for global and omnirc file, configuration for VMware and more. The complete advisory can be read\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2411,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2015\/11\/advisory-c04883615\/","url_meta":{"origin":1512,"position":5},"title":"Advisory c04883615","date":"25. November 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c04883615 on 2015\/11\/19 an advisory for HPE Data Protector 9.04 was released, describing a problem with the synchronisation of the CDB in Data Protector 9.04. The article describes the symptoms and offers a solution - the installation of a site specifc patch (SSPNT900_008, SSPLNX900_004 or SSPUX900_004). The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1512"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1512"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1512\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2630,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1512\/revisions\/2630"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1512"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}