Bei der Sicherung virtueller Maschinen mit der Virtual Environment Integration (VE) auf ein Catalyst Gateway (StoreOnce) kann es unter Data Protector 7.01 (aktuelle Patches) zu einem Abbruch bei der Sicherung kommen. Die Fehlermeldung sieht so aus:<\/p>\n
\r\n[Major] From: BSM@server.demo.local \"VE_Backup_VMware\" Time: 15\/07\/2013 10:03:03\r\n[61:3003] Lost connection to BMA named \"StoreOnce_01_GW1 [GW 2296:4:26641437476]\" \r\n on host server.demo.local.\r\n Ipc subsystem reports: \"IPC Read Error\r\n System error: [10054] Connection reset by peer\r\n<\/pre>\nAbhilfe schafft der omnirc Parameter
OB2D2D_BANDWIDTH_BUFF_SIZE=20<\/code> auf dem Media Agent. Der Parameter ist unter DP 7.01 auf den Standardwert 10 eingestellt, bei Verwendung von 20 f\u00fcr den Wert tritt das Problem nicht auf. Data Protector 8.00 ist hiervon nicht betroffen, da hier der Standardwert auf 20 eingestellt ist.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bei der Sicherung virtueller Maschinen mit der Virtual Environment Integration (VE) auf ein Catalyst Gateway (StoreOnce) kann es unter Data Protector 7.01 (aktuelle Patches) zu einem Abbruch bei der Sicherung kommen. Die Fehlermeldung sieht so aus: [Major] From: BSM@server.demo.local „VE_Backup_VMware“ Time: 15\/07\/2013 10:03:03 [61:3003] Lost connection to BMA named „StoreOnce_01_GW1 [GW 2296:4:26641437476]“ on host server.demo.local. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"spay_email":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.8.8","language":"de","enabled_languages":["en","de"],"languages":{"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"de":{"title":false,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p28cjj-ot","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1155,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2014\/01\/hanging-sessions-dp-7-01\/","url_meta":{"origin":1517,"position":0},"title":"Hanging Sessions with DP 7.01","date":"23. Januar 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}It has been told to me and I've seen it in some environments... with DP 7.01 it can occur that a sessions hang till forever or the backup is aborted after 7200 second. The message displayed shows IPC errors (i.e error below) as no more data from Disk Agent or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "HowTo"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1365,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/05\/ipc-invalid-packet-size\/","url_meta":{"origin":1517,"position":1},"title":"IPC Invalid Packet Size","date":"8. Mai 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}After the upgrade to DP 7.01 in some environments the rarley error IPC Invalid Packet Size has been seen while accessing a changer or tape device. The problem might be related to a slow name resolutuion on the media agent. The INET may run into a timeout before sending data\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "HowTo"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":935,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2012\/05\/dp-7-0-omnirc-variable\/","url_meta":{"origin":1517,"position":2},"title":"DP 7.0 – omnirc – connection abort","date":"4. Mai 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"{:de}Mit Data Protector 7.0 kann es beim Backup zu untenstehender Fehlermeldung kommen. Der Fehler wurde in einem Case best\u00e4tigt. Zur L\u00f6sung kann in der omnirc die Variable OB2INETTIMEOUT=10 auf den betroffenen Clients aktiviert werden. Danke an Dennis Lorentsen der die Information bereitgestellt hat. Error: [Major] From: BSM@cellmanager.local \u201ctest_1\u2033 Time: 01-05-2012\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bugs"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1393,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/05\/advisory-c03753986\/","url_meta":{"origin":1517,"position":3},"title":"Advisory c03753986","date":"25. Mai 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c03753986 on 2013\/05\/06 an advisory for HP Data Protector 6.11, 6.20, 6.21, 7.0 and 7.01 was released, describing a problem for restores of SAP data files and the file size is different from the SAP data file. When the omnirc parameter OB2SAPALIGN was used on Unix a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Advisory"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1588,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/09\/backup-performance\/","url_meta":{"origin":1517,"position":4},"title":"Backup performance","date":"23. September 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}If it matters, you had better trust on HP Data Protector to get fast backups and to achieve your backup windows. During the implementation of a StoreOnce appliance with a partner of HP, the following performance values were achieved (see pictures below). The environment: a backup of 5 virtual machines\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Common"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1313,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/03\/advisory-c03689762\/","url_meta":{"origin":1517,"position":5},"title":"Advisory c03689762","date":"11. M\u00e4rz 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c03689762 on 2013\/03\/08 an advisory for HP Data Protector 6.20 (6.21) and 7.0 (7.01) was released, describing a problem when running an incremental backup of a virtual machine using the virtuel environment integration and with change block tracking activated after a previous incremental backup failed. As a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Advisory"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1517"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1517"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1517\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2629,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1517\/revisions\/2629"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1517"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}