{"id":3199,"date":"2016-09-21T09:54:49","date_gmt":"2016-09-21T08:54:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/?p=3199"},"modified":"2016-09-21T09:54:49","modified_gmt":"2016-09-21T08:54:49","slug":"advisory-c05273359","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2016\/09\/advisory-c05273359\/","title":{"rendered":"Advisory c05273359"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Unter der Dokument ID c05273359on ist am 15.09.2016 bei HPE zu Data Protector 9.07 ein Advisory erschienen, welches eine Kommunikatiobsproblem mit mit Zero Downtime Backup und 3PAR Storage beschreibt. Der Artikel informiert \u00fcber die Symptome und Auswirkungen des Problems und bietet einen Workaround und eine L\u00f6sung an &#8211; die Installation eines Hot Fix (DP0907_b109_QCCR2A69014_HF1).<\/p>\n<p>Der vollst\u00e4ndige Artikel kann hier nachgelesen werden: <b><a href=\"http:\/\/h20564.www2.hpe.com\/hpsc\/doc\/public\/display?docId=emr_na-c05273359\" target=\"hotfix\">http:\/\/h20564.www2.hpe.com\/hpsc\/doc\/public\/display?docId=emr_na-c05273359<\/a><\/b>. Um den Hot Fix zu erhalten wird ein g\u00fcltiger Wartungsvertrag ben\u00f6tigt und es ist ein Support Case zu \u00f6ffnen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Unter der Dokument ID c05273359on ist am 15.09.2016 bei HPE zu Data Protector 9.07 ein Advisory erschienen, welches eine Kommunikatiobsproblem mit mit Zero Downtime Backup und 3PAR Storage beschreibt. Der Artikel informiert \u00fcber die Symptome und Auswirkungen des Problems und bietet einen Workaround und eine L\u00f6sung an &#8211; die Installation eines Hot Fix (DP0907_b109_QCCR2A69014_HF1). Der [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3200,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"spay_email":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.8.8","language":"de","enabled_languages":["en","de"],"languages":{"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"de":{"title":false,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/advisory.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p28cjj-PB","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2411,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2015\/11\/advisory-c04883615\/","url_meta":{"origin":3199,"position":0},"title":"Advisory c04883615","date":"25. November 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c04883615 on 2015\/11\/19 an advisory for HPE Data Protector 9.04 was released, describing a problem with the synchronisation of the CDB in Data Protector 9.04. The article describes the symptoms and offers a solution - the installation of a site specifc patch (SSPNT900_008, SSPLNX900_004 or SSPUX900_004). The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1320,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/03\/advisory-c03705726\/","url_meta":{"origin":3199,"position":1},"title":"Advisory c03705726","date":"26. M\u00e4rz 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c03705726 on 2013\/03\/20 an advisory for HP Data Protector and 7.0 (7.01) was released, describing a problem when a backup was taken to a backup to disk device and in restore context of DP GUI the file size is displayed as zero. As a workaround the list\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1313,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/03\/advisory-c03689762\/","url_meta":{"origin":3199,"position":2},"title":"Advisory c03689762","date":"11. M\u00e4rz 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c03689762 on 2013\/03\/08 an advisory for HP Data Protector 6.20 (6.21) and 7.0 (7.01) was released, describing a problem when running an incremental backup of a virtual machine using the virtuel environment integration and with change block tracking activated after a previous incremental backup failed. As a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2914,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2016\/03\/zdb-3par-vss-file-system-backup\/","url_meta":{"origin":3199,"position":3},"title":"ZDB 3Par &#8211; VSS File System Backup","date":"7. M\u00e4rz 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en} Setting up a File System backup using ZDB on 3Par is fairly simple, however there are a couple of challenges that you should be aware of, but we will address those later. ZDB backups are made up of basically three machines: Your application server where the file system resides\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Common&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1393,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/05\/advisory-c03753986\/","url_meta":{"origin":3199,"position":4},"title":"Advisory c03753986","date":"25. Mai 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c03753986 on 2013\/05\/06 an advisory for HP Data Protector 6.11, 6.20, 6.21, 7.0 and 7.01 was released, describing a problem for restores of SAP data files and the file size is different from the SAP data file. When the omnirc parameter OB2SAPALIGN was used on Unix a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3156,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2016\/07\/tech-work-hpe-data-protector-9-07\/","url_meta":{"origin":3199,"position":5},"title":"TECH After Work: HPE Data Protector 9.07","date":"13. Juli 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}Sorry, this article is not available in your language, as the promoted event is available in Germany only.{:} {:de}Der HPE Partner Godyo (http:\/\/www.godyo.com) l\u00e4dt am 18.08.2016 ab 15:00 zu der \"TECH After Work\" Veranstaltung ein. Unter dem Motto \u201eHPE Data Protector \u2013 Die Neuerungen in der Praxis\u201c zeigt Sebastian K\u00f6hler\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;SCD&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"godyo","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/godyo.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3199"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3199"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3199\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3202,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3199\/revisions\/3202"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3200"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3199"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3199"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3199"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}