{"id":831,"date":"2011-12-19T16:33:32","date_gmt":"2011-12-19T14:33:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/?p=831"},"modified":"2015-12-09T22:16:00","modified_gmt":"2015-12-09T21:16:00","slug":"slow-backup-on-windows-2008-r2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2011\/12\/slow-backup-on-windows-2008-r2\/","title":{"rendered":"Slow backup on Windows 2008 R2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Unter Data Protector 6.20 kann es bei Verwendung des Media Agent auf Windows 2008 zu einer langsamen Backup Performance kommen. Klar denkt sich jetzt jeder, das war seit der Einf\u00fchrung von DP 6.20 bekannt und wurde mit dem Patch DPWIN_00516 behoben. F\u00fcr alle die dennoch Probleme mit der Performance haben empfehle ich die Patch Beschreibung von DPWIN_00516 noch einmal zu lesen; es gibt daf\u00fcr eine neue omnirc Variable &#8211; OB2IPCNOSENDRECVLOOP=1. Bei Durchf\u00fchrung von Backups \u00fcbers Netzwerk sollte zus\u00e4tzlich noch die Variable OB2SHMIPC=0 gesetzt sein und damit die Performance Probleme behoben sein.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Unter Data Protector 6.20 kann es bei Verwendung des Media Agent auf Windows 2008 zu einer langsamen Backup Performance kommen. Klar denkt sich jetzt jeder, das war seit der Einf\u00fchrung von DP 6.20 bekannt und wurde mit dem Patch DPWIN_00516 behoben. F\u00fcr alle die dennoch Probleme mit der Performance haben empfehle ich die Patch Beschreibung [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"spay_email":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[121],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.8.8","language":"de","enabled_languages":["en","de"],"languages":{"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"de":{"title":false,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p28cjj-dp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":842,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2012\/01\/advisory-data-protector-org\/","url_meta":{"origin":831,"position":0},"title":"Advisory Data-Protector.org","date":"11. Januar 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}Different customers reported about problems with multipath devices in DP 6.21. The configuration of the multipath devices is no longer possible. The problem is with the GUI only, as backups run as expected. Following workarounds are possible: - Open a call and request hotfix QCCR2A35525. - Downgrade to DP 6.2\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":774,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2011\/09\/site-matters-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":831,"position":1},"title":"Site Matters 2","date":"16. September 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}In article Size Matters from 2010 (https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/2010\/06\/size-matters\/ I informed from a very big backup of a Informix database. Now I was able to get a screenshot from a very big filesystem backup. And once more I can say: Size matters and is backuped with HP Data Protector ;-) The screenshot\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Bugs&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1313,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/03\/advisory-c03689762\/","url_meta":{"origin":831,"position":2},"title":"Advisory c03689762","date":"11. M\u00e4rz 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c03689762 on 2013\/03\/08 an advisory for HP Data Protector 6.20 (6.21) and 7.0 (7.01) was released, describing a problem when running an incremental backup of a virtual machine using the virtuel environment integration and with change block tracking activated after a previous incremental backup failed. As a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1393,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2013\/05\/advisory-c03753986\/","url_meta":{"origin":831,"position":3},"title":"Advisory c03753986","date":"25. Mai 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With document ID c03753986 on 2013\/05\/06 an advisory for HP Data Protector 6.11, 6.20, 6.21, 7.0 and 7.01 was released, describing a problem for restores of SAP data files and the file size is different from the SAP data file. When the omnirc parameter OB2SAPALIGN was used on Unix a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advisory&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":823,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2011\/11\/nss-volumes-on-linux-oes-with-dp-6-20\/","url_meta":{"origin":831,"position":4},"title":"NSS Volumes on Linux OES with DP 6.20","date":"29. November 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}When you need to backup NSS volumes on a Linux OES server with Data Protector 6.2 it might be the case that the NSS volumes are not listed within GUI and you might receive the following error: 12:1304 The mountpoint\/file-system cannot be backed up. In this case you need to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Common&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2262,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/2015\/01\/data-protector-9-02-features-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":831,"position":5},"title":"Data Protector 9.02 features explained","date":"27. Januar 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en} In December HP released the new Data Protector version 9.02. With this release additional features were implemented. Some of the new features are explained in more detail below. New Data Protector features: Pausing and Resuming Backup Jobs Reporting for Capacity Based Licensing VMware GRE for 3PAR Snapshots StoreOnce CoFC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Common&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/831"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=831"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/831\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2715,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/831\/revisions\/2715"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}