Since the latest patches for Data Protector (621, 701) the kernel version 3 for Linux is supported to install a new client using installation server. In general there shouldn’t be a problem during the installation, however when you receive following error message (i.e. for OpenSuse or SLES 11 SP2): Unsupported architecture\/OS type (Linux CLIENT 3.1.9-1.4-desktop #1 SMP PREEMT …) Skipping Client!<\/b><\/i>, you have 3 options to handle on – 2 workarounds, 1 solution. Workaround 1: do a local installation of core.rpm and da.rpm on the client (packages can be extracted from installation server). Workaround 2: copy the file \/etc\/os-release to \/etc\/novell-release on the client in question and start the push installation using GUI. The solution will be the installation of a hotfix (the QCCR number I post as soon I have the fix received).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Since the latest patches for Data Protector (621, 701) the kernel version 3 for Linux is supported to install a new client using installation server. In general there shouldn’t be a problem during the installation, however when you receive following error message (i.e. for OpenSuse or SLES 11 SP2): Unsupported architecture\/OS type (Linux CLIENT 3.1.9-1.4-desktop […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"spay_email":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[148,149,150],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.8.8","language":"en","enabled_languages":["en","de"],"languages":{"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"de":{"title":false,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p28cjj-hH","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1169,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/2012\/10\/dp-7-01-remote-installation-linux-working\/","url_meta":{"origin":1097,"position":0},"title":"DP 7.01 remote installation Linux not working","date":"1. October 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}With Data Protector 7.01 there might be a problem when doing a remote installation of a Linux Client with Kernel 3 (i.e. SLES 11 SP2). In the GUI you might receive an error that the client is not supportet. This is a known problem and was fixed in previous versions\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Common"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2270,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/2015\/01\/data-protector-client-debian-based-systems\/","url_meta":{"origin":1097,"position":1},"title":"Data Protector client on Debian based systems","date":"27. January 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en} If you need to install the Data Protector client software on a Debian based system, you will recognize no derivate is listed in the support matrix as supported version and the Debian Linux 6.0 (x64) and 7.0 (x64), and Ubuntu 12.x (x64) are supported only. However, if you require\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Common"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1787,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/2014\/01\/advisory-dp-8-00-8-10\/","url_meta":{"origin":1097,"position":2},"title":"Advisory DP 8.00 \/ 8.10","date":"15. January 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}Data Protector 8.10: With Data Protector 8.10 it is very important to check name resolution before starting the installation. If it's not possible to resolve the FQDN of the cell server (of course short and revers too), a login prompt will appear when opening the GUI (this is the LDAP\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Advisory"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":230,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/2010\/11\/cannot-create-integration-backups-when-patch-dpwin_00483-is-installed\/","url_meta":{"origin":1097,"position":3},"title":"Cannot Create Integration Backups when Patch DPWIN_00483 is installed","date":"21. November 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}Once you installed the patch DPWIN_00483 (VEPA patch) you are no longer able to create new integration backups (Exchange, SQL, ...). Withhin GUI you are not able to browse for instances. The bug comes from changed manager.exe through patch DPWIN_00483. As a workaround you may use the JAVA GUI where\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bugs"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3591,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/2017\/08\/data-protector-9-gr-patches-9-09-build-116\/","url_meta":{"origin":1097,"position":4},"title":"Data Protector 9 \u2013 GR Patches 9.09 (Build 116)","date":"8. August 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}The General Release Patches\u00a0A.09.09 (Build 116) for Data Protector 9 has been released on August 8, 2017. The 116 GR Patches must be installed on top of the 115 GR Patches (which requires Patch Bundle 9.09). It is recommended to install all the GR Patches as a group regardless if\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "DP A.09.00"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3937,"url":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/2018\/04\/data-protector-9-gr-patches-9-09-build-117\/","url_meta":{"origin":1097,"position":5},"title":"Data Protector 9 \u2013 GR Patches 9.09 (Build 117)","date":"5. April 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"{:en}The General Release Patches\u00a0A.09.09 (Build 117) for Data Protector 9 has been released on April 4, 2018. The 117 GR Patches must be installed on top of the 115 and 116 GR Patches (which requires Patch Bundle 9.09). It is recommended to install all the GR Patches as a group\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "DP A.09.00"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1097"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2689,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097\/revisions\/2689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1097"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1097"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.data-protector.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1097"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}